Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?

[Pease Porridge]

What's All This Perpetual Motion Stuff, Anyhow?



Bob Pease  |   ED Online ID #1376  |   April 3, 2000

Article Rating: Not Rated

Once upon a time, the greatest minds in Europe were trying to meet the challenge of turning lead into gold. Lead is heavy and cheap. Gold is heavy and quite valuable. Surely it can't be THAT hard to transmute lead into gold, can it? So the greatest alchemists in medieval Europe tried to find ways to convert lead into gold.

It wasn't so easy. After much effort, some guys said they had learned how to convert lead into—well, it looked like gold. The skill needed to do this was that of the magician, or prestidigitation—sleight of hand. They would start out with a piece of lead and put it into a magical machine. After a suitable delay, it came out as (apparently) gold. If the moves were done properly, it could even pass assay. The opportunities for bunco artists were quite good in those days.

People really wanted to BELIEVE that they could get a ton of gold just starting from a ton of lead. The development of modern chemistry put an end to this. These days, almost nobody wastes much time trying to convert dross into gold. There are better projects....

As we've seen, these better ways to generate money involve perpetual-motion (P/M for short) machines. Sometimes, euphemistically, they're called "over unity" or "free energy." They claim they can provide an energy output that is "over unity" compared to the amount of energy input. Of course, people have long been trying to make P/M machines using obscure mechanical or electrical schemes.

Many times, these inventors were sincere—but mistaken—about how their scheme did (or did not) have fatal flaws. But since the demand and desires were so great, some of these "inventors" would make up elaborate fakes of getting out energy with no visible input. Whether the basic scheme was mechanical, chemical, or electrical, they would make sophisticated cheats to keep it running. Some guys used compressed air in hidden chambers to keep it running. Other times, it was hidden batteries or cords and cables activated by a remote partner. So the art of ingenious contrivance made it seem that the energy was generated INSIDE the invention. Actually, it was just the power source that was hidden inside. (Recently a sphere was shown that would rotate for an indefinite time—just sitting there spinning—and it wasn't even in a vacuum. Yeah, it would spin until the hidden battery in it ran down.)

I remember the Dean Drive. That goes way back. Mr. Dean first invented a set of levers so that his invention would climb up a pole or rope (U.S. Patent 2,886,976, filed 1956, issued 1959). Then he claimed that he had improved the invention so the machine would ascend and levitate in the air without any pole or rope! The mechanism he designed was a set of levers and counterweights and gears. The principle was claimed to be "rectifying centrifugal force." This was demonstrated by setting this machine on a bathroom scale and applying ac line power to a motor that turned the machine's input shaft. The scale would show a decrease in weight!

Wow, just keep that up, continue the improvements, and it will levitate right off the ground! (Of course, the possibility that a bathroom scale would have some dynamic nonlinearity and could give a false reading in the presence of ordinary vibration wasn't obvious to most people.) If you could generate a little force with a little power, you could generate MORE levitation force with more power.

So let's connect a whole ARRAY of these "Dean Drives" to a nuclear submarine, which would provide the electrical power. It took only a little arm-waving to prove that this could levitate and lift the nuclear submarine right up into space. Back in 1955, we could use a batch of Mr. Dean's drives to generate our space program without any need for expensive rockets.

I recall reading this in ANALOG Science Fiction magazine. I was a little skeptical. There MUST be something wrong with this scheme. Then I figured it out: If you could use a Dean Drive to generate a force in the middle of the air, without grabbing onto anything, then you could put it on the end of a long arm and provide it some power. The force it generated would start the arm rotating. When the arm got up to a high enough speed (e.g., in a vacuum), that force multiplied by the speed would be LARGER than the input power. One could extract more energy than the input and generate a perpetual-motion machine. Since this was not possible, the Dean Drive was surely a hoax.

Of course, the marvelous disclaimer in the front end of the magazine was a clue: "Everything in this magazine has no basis in fact, and nothing is necessarily true..." (a paraphrase). It was hard for me to reconcile this with the sincere statements in the stories, but I finally figured out where the truth lay.

The study of thermodynamics has been very serious and intense for over 150 years. The First Law of Thermodynamics states that energy is always conserved and is not created or destroyed. Thus, you cannot get out of a system more energy than you put in. (Let's leave e = mc2 out of this.)




<-- prev. page     [1] 2 3     next page -->

Reprints     Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?


  • A New Design Inflection Point
  • Forecasting Industry Growth For 2009 And Beyond
  • EDA Retools To Exploit Multicore Architectures
  • Design And Verification Move Up In Abstraction
  • EDA Retools To Exploit Multicore Architectures
  • A New Design Inflection Point
  • Design And Verification Move Up In Abstraction
  • Challenges Lurk For 22-nm Physical Implementation
    1) Build A Smart Battery Charger Using A Single-Transistor Circuit
    (257 views today)
    2) 2008 BEST Electronic Design Winners
    (103 views today)
    3) 1-A Switching Regulators Operate With 96% Efficiency To Replace Linear Regulators
    (103 views today)
    4) What's All This Transimpedance Amplifier Stuff, Anyhow? (Part 1)
    (89 views today)
    5) Microcontroller-Based Sine-Wave Generator Has Crystal Accuracy
    (88 views today)
    ALL TOP 20







    Reader Comments

    Something new METOZ machine about: http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/prolog_for_metoz.html

    Anonymous -January 21, 2007

    It is something METOZ about. http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/not_for_idiot.html http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/cycle_str.html http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/work_deflection.html http://www.metozor.nets.pl/metoz.htm http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_exper.html Thanks for understanding.

    Anonymous -November 01, 2006

    It is something METOZ about. http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/not_for_idiot.html Thanks for understanding. http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_exper.html P.S. The conception of an energy is discreate one to the same as a imbecility. No one has seen the energy and no one has seen the imbecility. We are able to observe results of the energy and imbecility. At present we have got to few energy because we have got to much imbecility. Thank you for your time and interest.

    Anonymous -October 17, 2006
    Read more comments...

    POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE

    Name:

    Email:
    Rate this article:

     less useful more useful 
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    Your Comments:

    Enter the text from the image below




    Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.
     
     

    PartFinder

    Find real-time pricing, stock status, same-day/next-day shipping options and more. Brought to you by Digi-Key. Go to PartFinder.    
    GlobalSpec

    PART SEARCH :
    Powered by: GlobalSpec - The Engineering Search Engine
    Sponsored Links

    Electronic Design Europe Electronic Design China EEPN Power Electronics Auto Electronics Microwaves & RF
    Mobile Dev & Design Schematics Find Power Products Military Electronics EE Events Related Resources