In the early days of analog ICs, chip designers had a large arsenal of circuit elements that let them create products with exceptionally high performance. Over time, to keep analog IC prices competitive, analog process technologies followed the lead of digital CMOS. Analog chip designers then found themselves with fewer and fewer magic analog bullets they could use to design new products. This has been particularly hard on engineers who design "industrial" mixed-signal systems, because they now find themselves squeezed between the relatively high-voltage world of their sensors and actuators and the ever diminishing operating and threshold voltages of successive CMOS generations.
In a welcome countertrend, analog/mixed-signal IC companies are developing new process technologies that permit mixing voltages on a single die as well as combinations of CMOS, high-voltage MOS, and high- and low-voltage bipolars. As a result, analog chip designers are again expanding their arsenals. Competition will continue to encourage innovation and improve performance.
What, exactly, are "industrial" analog and mixed-signal applications? Generally, the term encompasses factory automation and process control, instrumentation (both automatic test equipment and bench gear), medical products (ranging from MRI and CAT-scan equipment to portable diagnostic instruments and personal testers for glucose and fever temperature), and automotive (airbags, ABS, ignition control, active suspension, and tire-pressure monitoring). Taken together, these applications represent more than 30% of the market for data converters and signal-conditioning electronics.
What's the problem with using advanced CMOS-based analog chips in industrial designs? Engineers who create these systems are squeezed between the relatively high, often differential voltages at which their sensors and actuators operate and the voltage limits of the latest CMOS. Consequently, they've had to add more and more signal conditioning built on older technologies on either side of their converters and control systems. This approach is expensive and power-hungry, and it wastes board space.
Why an Operational Amplifier is often used in an inverter configuration rather than a non-inverter one, in other words why an inverter amplifier is preferred to the non-inverter in practically most of the applications. Thank you in advance for your precious reply! Best Regards! Amar.
Gamoura -May 30, 2005
I want to design a circuit that receives the signal of an encoder.
Mai Thang Long -December 12, 2004
Your Comments:
Enter the text from the image below
Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.
Search Electronic Design
Email Newsletter
Sponsored By:
Electronic Design UPDATE provides readers with late-breaking news, opinions from industry experts, and timely technology stories. It's a unique opportunity to get your product message in front of engineers, engineering managers, and corporate managers while they're reading about critical information online.
Reprints
